Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Tuttle

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 5, 1924Published

Appeals from Estill Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Olay

Affirming in each case.

These two cases involve similar questions and will be considered in one opinion. Each is a suit for damages for breach of a contract to construct and maintain a reasonable and convenient grade crossing. There was a judgment for $1,600.00 in the Tuttle suit and for $300.00 in the Masters suit.(1) _ Mrs. Tuttle is one of the Wiseman heim In purchasing the right of way through their farm, the railroad obligated itself in case of a partition to construct and maintain a reasonable and convenient grade crossing. It is conceded that that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Southern Railway Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HerringerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Big Sandy Railway Co. v. Rice's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API