Washington, Employment Security Department v. Hovan, Inc. (In re Hovan, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether certain state tax obligations are punitive or compensatory for the purpose of determining the priority of bankruptcy claims.
I
The State of Washington appeals the district court’s affirmance of a bankruptcy court’s order, which determined that Washington’s penalty assessments for state tax obligations were general unsecured claims in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of debtor Hovan, Inc. Washington contends that the assessments deserve priority status because they are compensatory rather than punitive.
Hovan filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- In Re a & C Properties, Debtors. William W. Martin, Superseded by Gilbert Robinson, in Intervention v. William E. Kane, Barbara Kelly, K & K Properties, Inc., and Investors Replacement, Inc., William W. Martin, Objectors-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Gilbert Robinson, Trustee in Bankruptcy, in InterventionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Hovan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996