Legal Opinion

People v. Fleckenstein

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided March 10, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

I had granted an inspection of the G-rand Jury minutes of this prosecution, and now I am asked by means of this supplementary motion to dismiss the indictment.

G-rand larceny in the first degree, for the alleged stealing of scaffolding, is the substance of the accusation set forth in what appears to be the only count in the indictment. This charge, defendants not only deny but also contend that there is no just basis in law for the finding of the indictment by the G-rand Jury.

In legal effect then, defendants mean to say that1 ‘ When the statute describes the offence, the proof, as well as the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LevanNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Wood v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. People v. Nicosia, New York County Courts1937
  4. People v. SclafaniNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1957
  5. People v. Saas, New York County Courts1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Briggs, New York County Courts1966
  2. People v. NorrisNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  3. People v. OcchipintiNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API