Legal Opinion

In re Weeks

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Hearing of exceptions to report of referee, to whom were referred the separate accounts, and objections thereto, of the two executors of decedent’s will, in proceedings for judicial settlement.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

In his findings respecting the *196apportionment of rents I think the referee has erred. The statute, L. 1875, ch. 542, is in these words: “ all rents reserved on any lease .... granted after the passing of this act and all annuities and dividends, and other payments of every description, made payable or becoming due at fixed periods, under any instrument executed after the passing of this act, or (being a last will and testament) that shall take effect after the passing of this act, shall be apportioned so that on the death of any person interested in any such rents, annuities,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weeks v. . CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Eberhardt v. SchusterNew York Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re ArkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Miller v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re FranklinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  4. In re Goetschius' EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API