Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1933No. 9092PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

“It may be now considered as settled that this court will not, under any circumstances, reverse a judgment granting a first new trial, whether the grant be general upon all the grounds of the motion or special upon one or more grounds only, or whether it be upon a ground which involves questions of evidence or upon a ground which involves *354purely questions of law; unless it be made to appear that no other verdict than the one rendered could possibly have been returned under the law and facts of Ore case. Unless the case can be brought within the exception just stated, it is useless for parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Parks v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. New v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniel v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API