Stone v. Rafter
General Court of Virginia
Assumpsit, and the declaration contained two counts, one for money had and received, and the other on a special agreement, The special count stated— That on the 22d February 1797, the defendant sold to the. plaintiff the land lying in Mlegany and Washington counties, which he the defendant had pui’diascd of Michael Bidenger, supposed to contain six and three quarter acres, being the same land on which the mills are erected, and where the defendant then resided; that the…
Read the full summary
Assumpsit, and the declaration contained two counts, one for money had and received, and the other on a special agreement, The special count stated— That on the 22d February 1797, the defendant sold to the. plaintiff the land lying in Mlegany and Washington counties, which he the defendant had pui’diascd of Michael Bidenger, supposed to contain six and three quarter acres, being the same land on which the mills are erected, and where the defendant then resided; that the defendant, by a writing under his band and seal, obliged himself to convey, or cause to be conveyed the said jand, together…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court,
[Duvall and Done, J.(a)]
decided, that the account in bar was inadmissible as evidence on the second count in the declaration,
2Cited by1 opinion
- Roloson v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855