Legal Opinion

Gein v. Little

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action on an undertaking.

1Opinion of the CourtClarice, J.

Action on an undertaking tried by the court without a jury. The suit is brought to recover a money judg*423ment upon the undertaking given to perfect the appeal to the Court of Appeals by the plaintiff in the action of Macgowan v. Gein, 13 N. Y. St. Repr. 421; affd. in the Court of Appeals, 122 N. Y. 643. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of the “ cash notes ” hereinafter referred to, and the defendants are the sureties upon the undertaking. The Special Term judgment, affirmed in both appellate courts, reformed a chattel mortgage given to secure certain promissory notes, and also reformed the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Mechanics' Banking Ass'n v. ConklingNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Ulster County Savings Institution v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Decker v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Goodwin v. . BunzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Barney v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Trustees of Village of Bath v. McBrideNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cohen v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928
  4. Farley v. . SchernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Gein v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API