Legal Opinion

State v. Barrow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2018No. C–160378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deters, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Anthony Barrow appeals his kidnapping conviction. He assigns as error the trial court's admission of evidence, its failure to grant his motion for a mistrial for an alleged Brady violation, the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting his conviction, and the trial court's and his counsel's handling of a claimed conflict of interest near the end of the trial. Finding none of his assigned errors meritorious, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Evidence Adduced at the Jury Trial

{¶ 2} Barrow and codefendants Andre Buck, Lonnie Rucker, and Timothy…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API