State v. Barrow
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Deters, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Anthony Barrow appeals his kidnapping conviction. He assigns as error the trial court's admission of evidence, its failure to grant his motion for a mistrial for an alleged Brady violation, the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting his conviction, and the trial court's and his counsel's handling of a claimed conflict of interest near the end of the trial. Finding none of his assigned errors meritorious, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
Evidence Adduced at the Jury Trial
{¶ 2} Barrow and codefendants Andre Buck, Lonnie Rucker, and Timothy…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2025