State Division of Human Rights v. Bystricky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Simoks, J. (dissenting).
Section 297 of the Executive Law provides substantial procedural rights to those accused of unlawful discrimination. Aside from the ‘ ‘ conference, conciliation and persuasion ” procedures, there is resort to a formal hearing and an administrative appeal. During all of this, a party may be represented by counsel, as this respondent was, and following that a proceeding to review may, within 30 days after service of the board’s order, be initiated in the Appellate Division, and its decision is reviewable by the Court of Appeals. (Executive Law, § 298.) This seems…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- State Division of Human Rights v. Employers-Commercial Union Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Castle Hill Beach Club, Inc. v. ArburyNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.