United States v. Chavez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant-Appellant Cynthia Chavez (“Chavez”) timely appeals her sentence of 15 months’ incarceration for narcotics convictions. Chavez claims that her personal characteristics entitled her to a maximum sentence of probation on the theory that the parsimony clause of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) establishes the “statutory maximum” for Apprendi purposes. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We write principally to reject Chavez’s flawed un derstanding of Apprendi, because the criminal statute of conviction — not the parsimony clause of the sentencing statute—…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Guadalupe Rosales-GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Michael MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bohlman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Chavez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.