Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gustafson v. National Insurance Underwriters

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1974No. 4700Published

1DissentWalter, Justice

I respectfully dissent. This is a summary judgment case. In my opinion the majority decided this case without regard to the summary judgment rules announced by the Supreme Court in Great American R. Ins. Co. v. San Antonio Pl. Sup. Co., 391 S.W.2d 41 (Tex.1965). In Le Tulle v. McDonald, 444 S.W.2d 794 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1969, writ ref. n. r. e.), the Court said:

“The Supreme Court in Great American Reserve Ins. Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co., 391 S.W.2d 41, 47 (Tex.Sup., 1965) set forth the rules relating to summary judgments. Omitting the citation of authorities found in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Whitmire v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API