Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Hazelwood

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 23, 2016No. Record 151158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY

The circuit court declared void a provision in a real property deed that sought to create a contingent reversionary interest in the grantor and her heirs. The beneficiary of that interest, Edward L. Hamm, Jr., argues on appeal that the provision, known as a possibility of reverter at common law, lawfully vested him with the reversionary interest. We agree and, thus, reverse the court's holding to the contrary.

I

In 1989, Dorothy Bigelow Hamm executed and recorded a deed of gift transferring her one-half interest in a parcel of property to her sister, Melba…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Sanford v. SimsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Sanford v. SimsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. County School Board v. DowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Moore v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canova Land & Investment Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Virginia · 2021
  2. Sainani v. Belmont Glen Homeowners AssociationSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API