Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.
**47 This summary process action concerns the degree of specificity required in the *618 pretermination notice 1 that, pursuant to regulations promulgated **48 by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), must be provided to a tenant who resides in federally subsidized housing before the landlord may commence an eviction proceeding against that tenant. Specifically, the issue presented is whether a pretermination notice asserting nonpayment of rent as the ground for the proposed termination of the tenancy is jurisdictionally defective if it includes either rent charges that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Eva Mae Roberts, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cameron-Brown Company and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Housing Authority v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Milford Redevelopment & Housing Partnership v. GlicklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Wittman v. Intense Movers, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Housing Authority v. ParksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Housing Authority v. CyrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.