Legal Opinion

Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 2019No. SC20043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.

**47 This summary process action concerns the degree of specificity required in the *618 pretermination notice 1 that, pursuant to regulations promulgated **48 by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), must be provided to a tenant who resides in federally subsidized housing before the landlord may commence an eviction proceeding against that tenant. Specifically, the issue presented is whether a pretermination notice asserting nonpayment of rent as the ground for the proposed termination of the tenancy is jurisdictionally defective if it includes either rent charges that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Eva Mae Roberts, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cameron-Brown Company and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Milford Redevelopment & Housing Partnership v. GlicklinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  3. Wittman v. Intense Movers, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Housing Authority v. ParksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  5. Housing Authority v. CyrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API