Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Chamberlain

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 2009No. 2-09-079-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Bryan Scott Chamberlain appeals the trial court’s order denying relief on his application for writ of habeas corpus that he filed pursuant to article 11.072 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. In two issues Chamberlain complains: that the trial court was required to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his application and, in an issue of first impression in Texas, that the Texas Sex Offender Registration Program (SORP) violates the substantive due process rights guaranteed to him under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Antonio Parra Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  2. Ex Parte ChamberlainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Bradley Gregg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
  4. Chamberlain, Ex Parte Bryan ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Chamberlain, Ex Parte Bryan ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API