Legal Opinion

Volusia Jai-Alai, Inc. v. McKay

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 10, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In the chancery court the appellant and the appellee, Florida ■ State Racing Commission, were defendants; the appellees Robert Neil McKay and Volusia County Kennel Qub, a corporation, were plaintiffs ; Gandy Operating Company and Monro Operating Company, both corporations, were intervenors; and attorneys for Fronton Exhibition Company were amici curte.

McKay was described in the complaint as a resident, citizen and taxpayer and Volusia County Kennel Club was alleged. to have owned and operated a dog race track since 1947.

On-29 March 1955, McKay ánd Volusia County Kennel Club…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. People ex rel. Whipple v. Judge of Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State Ex Rel. Comfort v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Millers' Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Fronton, Inc. v. Florida State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keating v. State Ex Rel. AusebelSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Mikos v. RINGLING BROS.-BARNUM & BAILEYSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Volusia Jai-Alai, Inc. v. RingSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API