Kirby v. Whitlock-Dobbs, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
Special ground numbered 4 of the amended motion for new trial is but an amplification of the usual general grounds and will therefore be considered in connection with them.
The evidence adduced on the trial of the case was in sharp 'conflict, with almost every phase of the plaintiff’s evidence being contradicted by the defendant and almost every phase of the defendant’s evidence being contradicted by the plaintiff’s wit nesses. It is unnecessary to go into great detail concerning such evidence for if the jury believed the evidence of the plaintiff corporation, which it was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brewer v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Limbert v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Fievet v. CurlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Bank of Loganville v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Sheridan v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Childers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Hodges v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Burns v. McLucasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Porter v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.