Legal Opinion

Muir v. Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Callaway Circuit Court. — Wow. David H. Harris, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

Suit to recover damages, for negligent delay in the shipment of forty-eight head of mnles from Windsor to Fulton, both in Missouri. The route of shipment over defendant’s line is from Windsor northeast to Sedalia twenty miles away, then from Sedalia east sixty miles to North Jefferson. From this last point to Fulton, a distance of twenty-five miles, the shipment went over the Chicago & Alton road, defendant having no line to Fulton.

The ordinary and usual time required to transport a shipment from Windsor to Fulton was twenty-four hours or less. The shipment in this case occupied something…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Bushnell v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Gilbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McFall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Hunt v. St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Gregory v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Carstens Packing Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Harrison v. C. A.R.R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API