Legal Opinion
Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2008No. 06-CV-05377CMTHKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision and Order on Claim Construction (Markman Decision)
McMahon, District Judge.
The Court, for its construction of the disputed claim terms in the patent in suit, No. 5,689,094.
Background
The '094 patent relates to a specific destination-based method for calling and dispatching an elevator. In a conventional elevator system, passengers call the elevator by pressing an “up” or “down” button in the elevator lobby and then designate their desired floor using buttons located in the elevator ear. With destination dispatching, passengers specify their desired floor in the lobby before…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Specialty Composites, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Inventio Ag. v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010