Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lee Investments, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 18, 2008No. CV-F-99-5583 OWW/SMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING LEE INVESTMENTS LLC’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 50(b), FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (Doc. 703)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
Lee Investments LLC (hereafter Lee) moves pursuant to Rule 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for judgment as a matter of law on the ground that no reasonable jury would have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereafter USF & G) and Aon Risk Services Inc. of Central California Risk Services (hereafter Aon) in that:
1. As a condition or exception limiting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Gibson v. City of CranstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Austrum v. Federal Cleaning Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Pearson v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023