Legal Opinion

Hurtzig v. Hurtzig

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on petition, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The petition is filed by the husband against the wife for divorce, upon the ground of adultery. There is no direct evidence of the fact of adultery, but it is claimed that the circumstances proved sustain the charge. It is not requisite that there shall be direct proof of this crime, for if that were the rule, there is not one case in a hundred where such proof would be attainable. The *330crime is almost invariably clandestine, and committed only when: every precaution is taken to preclude the possibility of its discovery. Familiar indicia of it are : loss of affection that is due…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pfender v. PfenderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Yara Engineering Corp. v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API