Galvin v. O'Brien
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
In 1885, plaintiffs held about $40,000 of the capita] stock of the Galvin Brass & Iron Works. The defendant was also a stockholder and director in the corporation. An agreement was entered into between the plaintiffs and defendant, by the terms of which defendant agreed, for a consideration of $3,000, to secure for plaintiffs the majority of the stock, so that at stockholders' meetings the plaintiffs could control the organization of the board, the election of officers, etc. The plaintiffs gave *484their check to defendant for $3,000, which was paid, and a memorandum was placed on the back of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People's Savings Bank v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Niederhauser v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Haener v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Vernon v. AntonaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Loud v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.