Legal Opinion

Galvin v. O'Brien

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

In 1885, plaintiffs held about $40,000 of the capita] stock of the Galvin Brass & Iron Works. The defendant was also a stockholder and director in the corporation. An agreement was entered into between the plaintiffs and defendant, by the terms of which defendant agreed, for a consideration of $3,000, to secure for plaintiffs the majority of the stock, so that at stockholders' meetings the plaintiffs could control the organization of the board, the election of officers, etc. The plaintiffs gave *484their check to defendant for $3,000, which was paid, and a memorandum was placed on the back of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People's Savings Bank v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Niederhauser v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Haener v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Vernon v. AntonaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Loud v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API