Legal Opinion

United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Brooklyn Wood Heel Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 11, 1934No. 6511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GALS TON, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent granted to Willard N. Sawyer, May 31,1932, No. 1,860,789, on an application filed January 12,1927.

The patent relates to a wood heel grooving machine and is concerned with the making of wood heels of the Louis type, as distinguished from the Cuban heel. The latter is relatively simple. The former is more difficult to manufacture, is more highly contoured, and is concave transversely.

On the front the heel has what was referred to at the trial as a “shank lip,” or at times just a “lip,”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Peters v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Houser v. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. Doig v. Morgan Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the Native Hawaiians Study Commission, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API