Legal Opinion
State v. Blacknall
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
760 A.2d 1151 (2000)
335 N.J. Super. 52
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff,
v.
James BLACKNALL, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal), Middlesex County.
Decided April 13, 2000.
Anthony Scarpelli, Assistant Prosecutor, for plaintiff (Glenn Berman, Middlesex County Prosecutor, Attorney).
John W. Hartmann, Princeton, for defendant.
HOFFMAN, P.J.S.C.
The novel issue presented is whether the attorney-client privilege extends to communications made to certain employees of the State Judiciary. Defendant James Blacknall made statements to a representative of the Middlesex County Criminal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Subpoena Duces Tecum On Custodian of RecordsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- In Re Custodian of RecordsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011