In re Healy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The Beferee, in his initial report and supplement thereto, has reported that charges of professional mistión*5duct, with the exception of the Cooney and Fitzgerald charges (the so-called worthless check cases), should be sustained. We find the evidence sufficient to sustain all the charges, including the Cooney and Fitzgerald charges, and hold that respondent knew or had reason to believe that covering funds were not and would not be available for payment of the checks issued. (See Matter of Frankel, 268 App. Div. 83.)
Other charges include neglect, misrepresentations, failure to comply with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944