M. E. Pickering Co. v. Friedman Realty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 39, April T., 1914, by plaintiff, from , judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 544, on verdict for defendant in case of M. H. Pickering Company v. Friedman Realty Company, impleaded with Edna Kane, otherwise known as Edna Lewis. Replevin for goods distrained.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 39, April T., 1914, by plaintiff, from , judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 544, on verdict for defendant in case of M. H. Pickering Company v. Friedman Realty Company, impleaded with Edna Kane, otherwise known as Edna Lewis. Replevin for goods distrained. Before McFarlane, J. From the record it appeared that on October 13, 1911, W. J. Morris, as bailiff of the Friedman Realty Company, agents, served a landlord’s warrant for $200 on Edna Lewis at 421 Second avenue. He did this by entering an outer door to the premises from an alley in the rear, the door being…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The plaintiff was the bailor, and Edna Kane was the bailee, of goods on the premises leased by Friedman Realty Company, the other defendant, to the latter. These goods were distrained by the landlord for rent in arrear. After the distress was made the plaintiff issued a writ of replevin against Edna Kane for the goods covered by the bailment, by virtue of which the sheriff *558delivered them to the plaintiff. The sheriff, finding the goods in the possession of the bailiff under a landlord’s warrant, served these parties, and afterwards an appearance was entered for them.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Ewald v. Fidelity Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Automobile Securities Co. v. ScungioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923