United States v. Kurt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
We affirm Wayde Kurt’s conviction for conversion of government property in excess of $1,000 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641.
The price sheet was properly admitted into evidence under Rule 803(17). Special Agent Jennings had 15 years experience in purchasing equipment for the Secret Service and testified that he received the price sheet through the normal process and that the sheet was a document that he would rely on in the regular course of his business. The district court found that the document appeared to be routinely published and defense counsel was able to obtain the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Esteban Bahena-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016