Legal Opinion
Enriquez v. Nettleship
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided February 17, 1984No. Civ. No. 82-2583 HLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAFFITTE, District Judge.
On January 16, 1984, plaintiffs were granted ten days to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed, pursuant to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and particularly in the light of the Opinion and Order in Rondon Prieto, et al. v. Carlos Jimenez Nettleship, Civil 82-2582, dated October 12, 1983.
Plaintiffs seek anchorage to their claim in 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1983, and 1985, as parents of Rubén Cancel González, mur*1272dered while under custody at the Bayamón Regional Jail. Defendant Carlos Jiménez Nettleship was the Director of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Culebra Enterprises Corp. v. RiosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985