Legal Opinion

Acker v. Henry Clay Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 17, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Moorman —

Affirming.

The plaintiffs below filed this suit in the Powell circuit court against the Henry Clay Oil Company, Zack T. Conner, and the three infant children of the plaintiff, Loudica Sparks, by her first husband, Melvin Townsend, to quiet title to a tract of about sixty acres of land on the headwaters of the south fork of Eed river in Powell county. Loudica Sparks and J. B. Sparks, her husband, asserted title to the fee, and T. B. Acker and S. E. Acker, lessees of the alleged freeholders, made claim to the mineral rights under a lease of January 31,1916.

By…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roche v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Rowe v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Cooksey v. TolliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Bybee v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Pierce v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API