Legal Opinion

Jacobs Instrument Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 1, 1991No. [No. 91, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, the appellant to pay the costs. Maryland Rule 835 b 5, provides that an appeal may be dismissed when the contents of the record extract do not comply with Rule 828 b. The latter rule requires that the record extract must contain “such parts of the record as may reasonably be necessary for the determination of the questions presented by the appeal,” including so much of the evidence, pleadings and other parts of the record as is material to the questions to be determined when a determination thereof depends upon the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. Yellow Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  2. Arundel Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Morrison-Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  4. United States v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Prime Contractors, Inc. v. M. & C. C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API