Legal Opinion
Henline, Inc. v. Martin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1976No. 2-275A38PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Defendants Harley M. Henline (Harley), Ruth Henline (Ruth), Donald D. Henline (Donald), Harley M. Henline II (“Sonny”), and Henline, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s refusal to set aside its entries placing them in default for failure to timely appear and respond to plaintiff Joe W. Martin’s action for personal injuries. Finding no reversible error, we are obliged to affirm.
Plaintiff-appellee Joe W. Martin filed his complaint against the four individual Henlines and Henline, Inc. on July 26, 1974. Martin claimed $250,000 for personal injuries allegedly suffered when he was struck by a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Green v. KarolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Selvia v. ReitmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Moe v. KoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- State Farm v. Shuman, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Stewart v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Vanjani v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.