Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Brooklyn

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the city court of Brooklyn. The opinion of the court contains the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Brown, J.

The plaintiff is the holder and assignee of a certificate issued by the defendant to James Bennett or R. P. Perrin, cashier, or order, for work done by the former on a contract for grading and paving Washington avenue in the city of Brooklyn. The certificate is in the words following:

*153“ No. 713. $2000. This certifies that there will be due from the city of Brooklyn to J ames Bennett or B. P. Perrin, cashier, or order, on contract for Washington avenue grading and paving from Douglas street to city line, the sum of two thousand dollars, payable upon surrender of this…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API