Mrs. Eva Prince Smith v. United States v. Mrs. Mattie Lou Trulock, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
The issue here is whether the wife or the former mother-in-law of a deceased serviceman is entitled to the proceeds of two national service life insurance policies. The jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Imajean Hawkins v. Bertha Lue HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Mary L. Baker v. United States of America and Caroline S. GardenhireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coomer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Aleene T. King, and Pamela Nicholson Coleman and Judy C. CrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Anne Marie Smith v. Irene M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Margaret Rosa Walker v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Prudential Insurance v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.