In re Linn Energy, LLC
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID R. JONES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
The final question presented in connection with the Court’s confirmation of two complex and heavily negotiated plans in these jointly administered cases is relatively simple—are the Debtors’ secured lenders entitled to payment of postpetition default interest? The Debtors’ secured lenders assert that the terms of the two confirmed plans unambiguously allow for the payment of postpetition default interest as provided for in the relevant credit agreements between the parties. The Debtors and two groups of noteholders assert that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Gary L. Hudson, IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026