Legal Opinion

Scusa v. Hoefler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: This record discloses no sufficient reason for excepting this ease from the general rule that transitory actions, all other things being equal, should be tried in the county in which the cause of action arose, particularly in view of the fact that all of the witnesses are residents of Oswego county. All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to change the place of trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckley Construction Corp. v. HungerfordNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lang v. SchmelzleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Pietranczyk v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Zambito Bros. v. Casper Mayrsohn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962