Legal Opinion

Grandin v. . Triplett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Civil actioN of trespass, involving also the issue of title, tried before Lane, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1916, of Watauga. The two' actions, presenting and dependent, practically, upon the same facts and conditions, the lands being contiguous and same map being used as to location, etc., were consolidated below and tried together by consent of parties. There was verdict for defendant, and plaintiffs excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. CueiaM.

We have carefully examined the record, and find no reversible error in the trial and disposition of these oases.

The plaintiff company exhibited a proper pajier title by grant from the State and mesne conveyances, the former bearing date in 1882, and the individual, also, his grant bearing date in-1872.

Defendant relied upon adverse possession maintained by his father, William Triplett, Sr., and after by himself for the required period, and, in support of such claim, introduced and relied in part upon a deed purporting to have been made by his father to himself, and occupation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. . SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. McConnell v. . Caldwell, Adm'r. .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Cowan v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  4. Maddox v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gill v. . PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Bunting v. . SalsburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API