Flanders v. Crolius
The Superior Court of New York City
Tms is an appeal from a judgment entered on a report of J. B. Scoles, Esq. as referee. The defendant moves for a new trial on the ground that the facts found by the referee are against evidence. " The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Bosworth, J.
This action was brought to recover of the defendant for goods famished to his brother. *207The referee’s report finds the facts to be, that the goods were purchased by the defendant, and that the credit was given exclusively to him. The defendant moves for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against evidence, and insists that the evidence shows, credit was given to Joseph Crolius, and that the promise of the defendant was collateral, and not being in writing is void by the statute of frauds.
It is uncontradicted that the four bills first furnished to Joseph Crolius were obtained on…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Boykin v. Dohlonde & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Billingsley v. DempewolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Rottmann v. PohlmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Hanford v. HigginsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857