Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1899No. 519Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Slates for the Northern Division of the District of Washington.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought upon two policies of insurance on the life of Samuel B. Stewart:, each for the sum of $2,500. One premium was paid on each policy when delivered. No other premiums were ever paid. The pleadings in this ease, as to forfeiture, are similar to the case of Insurance Co. v. Sears (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 986. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in ereor for $5,091, with interest and costs. Upon the legal principles announced in Insurance Co. v. Hill, Id. 263, and authorities there cited, the judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mutual Life Ins. v. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API