Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
The principal question raised by this appeal is whether the commission must file findings of fact which em-. brace the essentials upon which it bases the reasonableness of its rate order.
Sec.227.13, Stats.,provides:
“Every decision of an agency in a contested case shall be in writing accompanied by findings of fact and conclusions of law. The findings of fact shall consist of a concise and separate state-' ment of the'ultimate conclusions upon each contested issue of fact without recital of evidence.”
The commission contends that its statement of facts is concise and sufficient. In the opinion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.