Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvey v. J. H. Harvey Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2003No. S02G1713Published

1DissentSears, Presiding Justice

In this action for breach of contract, the majority adheres to a rule that prohibits an employee from seeking damages at the time of trial for any uncompleted portions of his employment contract, and instead forces the employee to file an action for damages as each year of his contract expires. This rule is burdensome to the courts, is unfair to employees, and has been almost universally abandoned in other jurisdictions. Because I find no justification for following this rule, I dissent to the majority opinion.

1. The appellant, Joseph H. Harvey III (hereinafter “Harvey III”), alleges that he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Boothby v. Texon, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Cutter v. GilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Roberts v. RigdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Roberts v. CrowleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API