Mestice v. McShea
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing with prejudice his petition for relief from a state court judgment. He asks removal of the proceedings to a federal court and an injunction against the judgment. It is unnecessary to go into, the history or merits of the litigation. Suffice it to say that there are no proceedings to remove here. The state litigation terminated in a judgment which is now final. It is, therefore, res judicata. This court has no authority, to sit in review of that judgment.
The order dismissing the' petition will be affirmed.
2Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Savers Federal Savings & Loan Assoc., the Federal Savings and Loan Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- In The Matter Of Meyerland Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Thorp Finance Corp. v. LehrerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. SellardsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1990
- Filan v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.