Legal Opinion
James v. City of Jersey City
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 7, 1999No. CIV 97-2368(WHW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Frank D’Agosta to vacate the default judgment entered against him because of allegedly improper service of process and excusable neglect. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. 78, the Court decides this motion without oral argument. Defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment is denied.
FACTS
On August 16,1995, plaintiff Brent James, a truck driver, delivered furniture to defendant D’Agosta’s residence in Jersey City. Before plaintiff unloaded the furniture, he requested payment for both the furniture and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency. Appeal of Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BROWN v. QUINNDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Banks v. Kottemann Law FirmDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021