Legal Opinion

King v. City Nat. Bank of Paducah, Ky.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 8 Div. 344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The bill is by the City National Bank of Paducah, Ky., to foreclose a vendor’s lien on a large body of land located in Colbert county in this state. These timber lands were formerly owned by the A. B. Smith Lumber Company, a partnership composed of A. B. Smith and his wife, E. K. Smith, and sold in May, 1924, to M. P. Haynes, doing business as the Haynes Lumber Company. The deed recited the retention of a vendor’s lien for the purchase price, and the purchase-money notes contained similar ‘ recitals. ' The purchase price was in round numbers $90,000, and the purchase notes Were transferred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Wells v. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Hooper v. Bankhead & BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Christopher v. Curtis-Attalla Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Birmingham Fuel Co. v. BoshellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank of Eutaw v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Cobb v. StinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API