Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided January 3, 2007No. 10-06-00024-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

In two issues, Ronnie Hawkins challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting his theft conviction following a bench trial. Hawkins, previously having been twice convicted of theft, was charged with state-jail-felony theft of a roll of barbed wire (valued at less than $50) from a hardware store supply yard. Hawkins alleges that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient because the evidence shows that no theft occurred: the theft was foiled and the suspect fled the scene without taking the wire. We will affirm.

When reviewing a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gerald Mac Lowrey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  2. Adron Slough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. Adron Slough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  4. Arlington Joseph Pitte v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Charles Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API