Lankler, Siffert & Wohl LLP v. Rossi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Defendants-Appellants (“Defendants”) appeal from the grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs and entry of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
Defendants first claim that plaintiff Lankier, Siffert & Wohl should have been disqualified from representing the other plaintiffs in this matter, because the firm represented defendant Rossi in the underlying criminal matter. We have made it clear that motions to disqualify are disfavored.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frank J. Ginett, Cross-Appellant v. Computer Task Group, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Lankler Siffert & Wohl, LLP v. RossiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
3Cited by10 opinions
- Christina Medina v. AAM 15 Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Feltman v. Staff Management Group LLC (In re Corporate Resource Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Gonzalez v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Jeffery v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Jenkins v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.