Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaufman v. Bauer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 23, 2005Published

1DissentSuarez, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. The issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff made a sufficient showing to permit restoration of her case to the trial calendar. I agree with the Civil Court that she did and would therefore affirm the order and permit plaintiff to have her day in court.

Contrary to the position advanced by the majority, the redacted affirmation of a board certified surgeon submitted by plaintiff is sufficient to establish possible merit to plaintiff’s

*64claim. (See Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [1st Dept 2001] [motion to restore only requires a minimal showing of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nepomniaschi v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Welch v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Barton v. JablonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Bergan v. Home for IncurablesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Enax v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API