Legal Opinion

First & Citizens National Bank v. Toxey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

At the trial evidence was offered by the plaintiff tending to show that the note sued on was tendered to and accepted by the plaintiff in renewal of a note payable to the plaintiff, which was executed by the defendants Sudie Toxey and W. G. Lloyd Toxey, as makers, and by the defendants Sarah J. Toxey and J. H. Aydlett, as endorsers. The defendants’ objection to this evidence was overruled. The evidence was competent as tending to show that the defendant had endorsed the note sued on, as the evidence for the plaintiff tended to show. The decision in American Bank and Trust Co. v. Harris, 180…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Bank v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Tuttle v. Junior Building Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API