Legal Opinion

State v. Pendergrass

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1994No. 18647PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Hearing the evidence without a jury, the trial court found Defendant, David L. Pen-dergrass, guilty of “fishing without a valid fishing permit” and levied a $500 fine. Defendant appeals, presenting three points relied on: (1) the information was insufficient; (2) there was no substantial evidence that he lacked the requisite permit; (3) there was no substantial evidence that he was “fishing.”

The trial court’s findings have the force and effect of a jury verdict. Rule 27.01(b), Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure (1993); State v. Giffin, 640 S.W.2d 128, 130[1] (Mo.1982); State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. GiffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. RosendahlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API