Legal Opinion

Dawson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1897No. 1110PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts of the case are made sufficiently apparent by the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to commit arson, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years; hence this appeal.

The principal witness in the case against appellant was L. F. Saucer, a confessed accomplice. He testified to a positive agreement between defendant (C. A. Dawson), himself, W. R. Clark, and John Thomas, made and entered into at Lancaster, in Dallas County, 'about the 17th day of October, 1895, to burn a house situated in Cameron, Milam County. Appellant had stored in said house a lot of household goods, including a…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Sweeten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Zimmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Feldman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Mayfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API