Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sanford Steel Pipe Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 24, 1972No. C.D. 4346Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Landis, Judge:

I concur only in the result overruling these protests.

The letters claimed to be appeals for reappraisement were written and sent to customs by a customhouse broker, in the capacity of agent for the plaintiff. The sense of the letters is not that they are appeals for reappraisement to a judge of this court under section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.A., section 1501), but rather requests for administrative relief under section 520(c) (1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.A., section 1520).

The record establishes that the person who wrote…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Ore Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API