Legal Opinion
Estate of Ratliff v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided September 5, 1995No. Docket No. 16017-91Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
ESTATE OF HARRY W. RATLIFF, DECEASED, THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, VINITA, OKLAHOMA, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Estate of Ratliff v. Commissioner
Docket No. 16017-91.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1995-428; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 430; 70 T.C.M. (CCH) 600;
September 5, 1995, Filed
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
Thomas J. McGeady and John J. McQueen, for petitioner.
Edith F. Moates, for respondent.
GERBER, Judge
GERBER
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
GERBER, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlos and Jacqueline Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph, Jr. And Anastasia Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Marcello v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.